tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post2696620308397187033..comments2024-03-07T11:39:09.758+11:00Comments on Will Type For Food: People believe in thing they have never heard ofTimThttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10333303180015967125noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post-62671386154270896772010-12-10T12:32:53.700+11:002010-12-10T12:32:53.700+11:00Maybe if it occurs it will be a major impact for t...Maybe if it occurs it will be a major impact for the better?TimThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10333303180015967125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post-8300716705618374642010-12-09T19:29:01.809+11:002010-12-09T19:29:01.809+11:00I'm a bit more mundane than that, TimT...all t...I'm a bit more mundane than that, TimT...all this talk, but what does it actually ACHIEVE!! I'm glad I won't be around to see the future, after climate change has had a major impact! :< )Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post-50658441895454832282010-12-09T11:58:18.051+11:002010-12-09T11:58:18.051+11:00Indeed 'climate change' is pretty much irr...Indeed 'climate change' is pretty much irrefutable. EVERYTHING changes, including the climate. 'The only thing constant is change itself' - Heraclitus. <br /><br />So AGW skeptics can mischeviously proclaim 'I'm a skeptic and I believe in climate change'.TimThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10333303180015967125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post-21543963877414966092010-12-09T11:50:02.378+11:002010-12-09T11:50:02.378+11:00In terms of the labels used, I think 'greenhou...In terms of the labels used, I think 'greenhouse effect' was first, then 'global warming', and then 'climate change'. 'Climate change' is especially useful because it's so general - it could conceivably be used to describe any weather change, whether it be permanent or temporary, major or minor, hotter or colder, worse or better.TimThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10333303180015967125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post-58060428860457426612010-12-09T11:27:44.721+11:002010-12-09T11:27:44.721+11:00Man, these climate change posts are magic. Instant...Man, these climate change posts are magic. Instant comments controversy! <br /><br />Must admit I do that 'its/it's' thing a LOT.TimThttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10333303180015967125noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post-84961226360204569442010-12-09T10:55:34.113+11:002010-12-09T10:55:34.113+11:00dear SarahJ - no point in trying to educate that b...dear SarahJ - no point in trying to educate that bad-tempered little Bwca. Bigger people have attacked her before this.Ann ODynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01159263330547329077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post-75937091850298055312010-12-09T10:52:02.957+11:002010-12-09T10:52:02.957+11:00Friends of mine in 8th grade did a project on risi...Friends of mine in 8th grade did a project on rising sea levels due to melting of polar ice caps. We didn't call it climate change, we called The Greenhouse Effect and ENVIRONMENTAL APOLCALYPSE!!!!!!!!!!!M L Jassyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13918911547104202603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post-44807369849845276072010-12-09T10:41:12.662+11:002010-12-09T10:41:12.662+11:00You can't deride something 'via' somet...You can't deride something 'via' something. That is the incorrect conjunction. You should have used 'because of' or something similar. Also, that 'its' you've used shouldn't have an apostrophe.sarahjhttp://www.sarahjansen.wordpress.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7529903.post-17495263600693745892010-12-09T10:27:39.992+11:002010-12-09T10:27:39.992+11:00Dear WTFF, your own credibility is such that I ass...Dear WTFF, your own credibility is such that I assume the quote is exact, so I can deride the statement's veracity via it's bad grammar.<br />end of debate.BwcaBrowniehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11500142856655553009noreply@blogger.com