I guess I intended the irony to distract the reader from the fundamnetal functional boringness of the sentence. (It wouldn't be half as much fun if it was just 'it was the second room in a series of three rooms', or whatever.)
The story that it's from also contains the words 'luxurious', 'opulence', 'redolent', 'perfumed', 'pink', 'pinkly', 'silk', 'satin', 'velvet', and 'damask'.
Well, I thought it was kind of cute. I don't suppose you meant it be ironic when you wrote it..?
ReplyDeleteI guess I intended the irony to distract the reader from the fundamnetal functional boringness of the sentence. (It wouldn't be half as much fun if it was just 'it was the second room in a series of three rooms', or whatever.)
ReplyDeleteThe story that it's from also contains the words 'luxurious', 'opulence', 'redolent', 'perfumed', 'pink', 'pinkly', 'silk', 'satin', 'velvet', and 'damask'.
Turning your hand to Mills & Boon...?
ReplyDeleteKinda sorta. Actually, it's a story about the consumation of a relationship between a lustful couch and an indifferent man.
ReplyDeleteAh, Tim, you really are quite wonderful.
ReplyDelete